UKRAINE’S MONETARY POLICY EFFECTIVENESS UNDER WAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56197/2786-5827/2022-1-3-3Keywords:
key rate, certificate of deposit, refinancing, issuing money, domestic government bond, foreign exchange intervention, international reservesAbstract
Introduction. Notwithstanding the Ukrainian banking system's resilience under war, there are devaluation and inflation pressures. In turn, monetary policy is found to be vital to combat drastic GDP decline and FX reserve depletion.
Materials and methods. In an attempt to examine the effectiveness of the NBU's (National bank of Ukraine) monetary policy, the article employs comparative and statistical analysis of its instruments based on data regarding dynamics of key and other interest rates (deposits, loans, certificate of deposits, refinancing, DGBs), volumes of foreign exchange interventions and international reserves, DGBs.
Results and discussion. This paper summarises the fundamental changes in monetary policy since the beginning of the full-scale war. The findings demonstrate a shift from the policy priority of inflation targeting and a freely floating exchange rate in favour of monetary financing of the budget deficit. At the same time, the devaluation of the national currency is restrained mainly at the expense of international credit and grant funds, which makes it possible to cover the losses of the NBU's FX reserves to support the exchange rate and carry out additional money issuance.
The results show that under the war, the NBU's monetary policy is effective in limiting devaluation processes due to the timely introduction of a fixed exchange rate, strengthening of currency restrictions and their further adjustment. However, due to the increase in the discount rate and the corresponding increase in interest rates on certificates of deposit and refinancing and a slight increase in deposits, DGBs did not restrain inflation due to the lack of alternative monetary financing of the budget deficit. Further focus exclusively on the inflation targeting regime does not meet the current tasks of monetary policy and thereby reduces its effectiveness. The current budget dependence on monetary financing requires optimising monetary expansion measures in order to flow the issuing money from the military to the consumer market.
Conclusions. The effectiveness of inflation targeting with limited monetary policy transmission indicates that the NBU should focus on other goals equally crucial to maintaining price stability, such as limiting exchange rate fluctuations and monetary financing for economic growth. In post-war recovery, the monetary policy direction solely on inflation targeting will remain inappropriate, given the mainly non-monetary factors of inflation.
References
Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (2004), “On the effectiveness of monetary policy and of fiscal policy”, Review of Social Economy, vol. 62(4), pp. 441–463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034676042000296218.
Mishkin, F. S. (2009), “Is monetary policy effective during financial crises?”, American Economic Review, vol. 99(2), 573–577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.2.573.
Aastveit, K. A., Natvik, G. J. J. and Sola, S. (2013), “Economic uncertainty and the effectiveness of monetary policy”, Norges Bank Working Paper, vol. 17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2353008.
Chong, B. S. (2010), “Interest rate deregulation: Monetary policy efficacy and rate rigidity”, Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 34(6), pp. 1299–1307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.11.026.
Demertzis, M. and Wolff, G. B. (2016), “The effectiveness of the European Central Banks’s asset purchase programme”, Bruegel Policy Contribution, No. 2016/10. DOI: https://doi.org/10419/165978.
Jäger, J. and Grigoriadis, T. (2017), “The effectiveness of the ECB’s unconventional monetary policy: Comparative evidence from crisis and non-crisis Euro-area countries”, Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 78, pp. 21–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.07.021.
Primus, K. (2016), “The effectiveness of monetary policy in small open economies: an empirical investigation”, IMF Working Papers, no. WP/16/189. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2016/wp16189.pdf (accessed November, 15, 2022).
Borio, C. E. and Hofmann, B. (2017), “Is monetary policy less effective when interest rates are persistently low?”, BIS Working Papers, no. 628. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2957961 (accessed November, 15, 2022).
Ahmed, R., Borio, C. E., Disyatat, P. and Hofmann, B. (2021), “Losing traction? The real effects of monetary policy when interest rates are low, BIS Working Papers, no. 983. URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/work983.htm (accessed November, 15, 2022).
English, B., Forbes, K. and Ubide, A. (2021), “Monetary Policy and Central Banking in the Covid Era”, CEPR Press. URL: https://cepr.org/system/files/publication-files/60024-monetary_policy_and_central_banking_in_the_covid_era.pdf (accessed November, 15, 2022).
Wei, X. and Han, L. (2021), “The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on transmission of monetary policy to financial markets”, International Review of Financial Analysis, no. 74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101705.
Altavilla, C., Lemke, W., Linzert, T., Tapking, J. and von Landesberger, J. (2021), “Assessing the efficacy, efficiency and potential side effects of the ECB's monetary policy instruments since 2014”, ECB Occasional Paper, no. 278. URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op278~a1ca90a789.en.pdf (accessed November, 15, 2022).
Rossi, B. (2021), “Identifying and estimating the effects of unconventional monetary policy: How to do it and what have we learned?”, The Econometrics Journal, vol. 24(1), C1–C32. https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaa020.
Coenen, G., Montes-Galdon, C. and Schmidt, S. (2021), ”Macroeconomic stabilisation and monetary policy effectiveness in a low-interest-rate environment”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 7(59). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2021.104205
Lepetit, A. and Fuentes-Albero, C. (2022), “The limited power of monetary policy in a pandemic”, European Economic Review, vol. 104168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104168.
Rohova, O. V. (2016), “Ukraine’s monetary policy efficiency estimate”, Scientific bulletin of Polissia, vol. 4(8), рp. 310–316. URL: http://nvp.stu.cn.ua/article/view/95689 (accessed November, 15, 2022).
Baranovskyi, O. I., Kuzheliev, M. O., Zherlitsyn, D. M., Sokyrko, O. S. and Nechyporenko, A. V. (2019), “Econometric models of monetary policy effectiveness in Ukraine”, Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, vol. 3(30), pp. 226–235.
Korablin, S. (2022), “Ukraine: the financial dimension of the war”, Visnyk of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, vol. 7, pp. 39–41. URL: https://visnyk-nanu.org.ua/ojs/index.php/v/article/view/1104 (accessed November, 15, 2022).
Bublyk, Y., Brus, S. and Shpanel-Yukhta, O. (2022), “Prospects and obstacles to the restructuring of Ukraine’s external state obligations in the conditions of war”, Economy and Forecasting, vol. 2, pp. 7–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2022.02.007.
Shapoval, Y. (2022), “Monetary policy of commodity-dependent economies”, VUZF Review, vol. 7(3), pp. 39–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38188/2534-9228.22.3.04.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Yuliia Shapoval
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
