COUNTERING HOSTILE INFORMATION ACTIVITIES USING SOCIAL PLATFORMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56197/2786-5827/2024-3-3-5Keywords:
hostile information activities, disinformation, disinformation,, social platforms, countering hostile information activitiesAbstract
Introduction. The article is devoted to analyzing hostile information activities utilizing social platforms and seeking methods to counter them. It acknowledges the particular vulnerability of contemporary society to disinformation due to changes in the information environment and technological advancements. The primary aim of the research is to analyze the tools employed by countries and international organizations to combat disinformation and to identify directions for further development of information policy to enhance resilience against hostile information activities.
Materials and methods. Official reports from international organizations, government entities, research from non-governmental organizations, and analysts constitute the main sources for analysis. The method of synthesizing scientific data is utilized to analyze and consolidate research findings and scholarly publications concerning hostile information activities and their societal impact.
Results and discussion. The study extensively presents instruments of hostile information activities such as disinformation, propaganda, external information manipulation, among others. The author identifies and describes the consequences of employing these instruments, including diminished trust in traditional media, societal polarization, and erosion of trust in governmental institutions. An analysis of stages of Russian hostile information influence on Ukraine is conducted, highlighting major categories of hostile narratives and disinformation propagated by Russia during periods of full-scale intrusion. Measures undertaken by Ukraine to safeguard its information space and resist Russian information aggression are delineated.
Instances of information aggression from Russia and China toward other nations via social platforms are provided. The objectives and methods employed by these countries, including the dissemination of disinformation and manipulation of public opinion, are described.
Conclusions. Recommendations aimed at enhancing the capacity to counter hostile information activities and society's resilience to external threats are identified. The conclusions underscore the critical importance of understanding and controlling information processes to ensure national security amid hybrid warfare. Hostile actions, particularly through social networks, aimed at spreading disinformation and manipulating public opinion to destabilize societies and heighten political polarization, pose threats not only to national security but also to democratic processes. In response, countries must implement diverse and extensive measures to counteract these threats, including increasing media literacy, monitoring disinformation, and collaborating with other nations to mitigate the impact of informational threats.
References
Horban, Yu. (2015), “Information war against Ukraine and means of its conduct”, Bulletin of the National Academy of State Administration under the President of Ukraine, Vol., 1, 136-141, URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vnadu_2015_1_21
Drabyuk, S. (2022), “Propaganda and its types, Ways of countering propaganda”. Analytical and comparative jurisprudence, Vol. 5, 153–157. URL: https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2022.01.28
Horun, O. (2023), “Principles of formation of enemy propaganda and countermeasures against it in the conditions of martial law in Ukraine”, Information and Law, Vol. 2(45), 163-171. URL: https://doi.org/10.37750/2616-6798.2023.2(45).282340
Denisyuk, Zh. Z. (2021), “Propaganda and counter-propaganda in the context of state information policy strategies”, Academic notes of TNU named after V.I. Vernadskyi. Series: Public Administration, Vol. 32 (71) No. 2, 46-51. URL: https://doi.org/10.32838/TNU-2663-6468/2021.2/08
Shevtsiv, M. and Honcharuk, K. (2019), “Propaganda as a socio-legal phenomenon: problems of understanding”. Actual problems of historical-legal and international legal science. South Ukrainian magazine, Issue 1, 119–122. URL: https://doi.org/10.32850/sulj.2019.1-29
Dubov, D., Barovska, A. and Kazdobina, Yu. (2020), Destructive influences and negative narratives: detection and countermeasures tools: method. mat. K.: UFBS, 60 p., URL: https://ufss.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/UFSS_MediaLiteracy.pdf
Lisnevska, A. (2019), “Misinformation in news video content: markers and methods of recognition”, Bulletin of Lviv University. Series of Journalism, 45, 60-66. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vjo.2019.45.9985
Pavlenko, T. (2022), “Disinformation: concepts, signs and countermeasures prospects”, Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 7, 337-339. URL: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2022-7/80
Shulska, N., Zinchuk, R. and Kevlyuk, I. (2023), “Narratives of the formation of despair as a manifestation of a hostile informational and psychological operation: on the material of the language of mass media”, Scholarly notes of V. I. Vernadsky Tavri National University. Series: Philology. Journalism, T. 34 (73), No. 2. Part 2, 152–157. URL: https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2023.2.2/25
Ivanytska, B. and Danilov, O. (2020). The influence and importance of fakes in world history. Bulletin of the Lviv Polytechnic National University. Series: Journalistic Sciences, 4, 143-147. URL: https://doi.org/10.23939/sjs2020.01.143
Zolotukhin, D. (2018). White book of special information operations against Ukraine 2014–2018. Kyiv: 384 p.
Treyger, E., Cheravitch, J. and Raphael, S. (2022). Cohen, Russian Disinformation Efforts on Social Media. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. URL: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR4373.2
Disinformation and Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. (2022), OECD Policy Responses on the Impacts of the War in Ukraine, URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/dc825602-en
Flore, M. (2020). Understanding Citizensâ Vulnerabilities (II): From Disinformation to Hostile Narratives, EUR 30029 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, URL: https://doi.org/10.2760/276141, JRC118914.
Harold, S., Beauchamp-Mustafaga, N. and Hornung J. (2021). Chinese Disinformation Efforts on Social Media. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. URL: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR4373.3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Дмитро Паламарчук

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.